SOX Compliance

How to Avoid Material Weaknesses in SOX Compliance

In 2002, Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in response to multiple financial scandals, including Enron, Tyco, and WorldCom. These scandals unveiled corporate failures and fraud that resulted in substantial financial losses for institutional and individual investors.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance can protect investors by improving internal controls over financial reporting and the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures.

Identifying deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal controls is an important aspect of SOX compliance. Addressing material weaknesses is not just a legal requirement but a cornerstone of corporate governance and ensuring investor confidence, no matter the company size.

In this article, we define what a SOX material weakness is and provide actionable strategies and best practices to avoid it.

What Is a Material Weakness?

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) defines a material weakness as “a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.”

Identifying and addressing material weaknesses increases internal costs but is crucial because they can lead to inaccuracies in financial reporting, erode investor confidence, and result in legal and financial repercussions.

SOX Section 404 requires the CEO and CFO to report any material weakness in their public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the fiscal year or period in which they identify them. This can impact the company’s stock price and ability to secure financing and increase external audit costs.

Some of the most common material weaknesses relate to:

• Inadequate segregation of duties
• Ineffective risk assessments
• Insufficient management review procedures
• Inappropriate reliance on accounting software or other third parties

Material weakness vs. significant deficiency

Material weaknesses and significant deficiencies both relate to internal control over financial reporting but have distinct implications.

A material weakness is a severe deficiency in the design or operation of internal controls, which could lead to a material misstatement in a company’s financial statements not being prevented or detected on a timely basis. The key aspect of a material weakness is its potential impact on the financial statements’ reliability, posing a substantial risk to the company’s financial integrity and the interests of its stakeholders.

On the other hand, a significant deficiency is less severe than a material weakness yet is concerning enough to merit attention from those responsible for overseeing the company’s financial reporting. While a significant deficiency might not have the immediate potential to cause a material misstatement in financial reporting, it indicates a flaw in the internal control system that could become more serious if not addressed.

The primary difference lies in the severity and potential impact on financial reporting. Material weaknesses require immediate attention and remediation due to their potential to affect financial statements significantly. Significant deficiencies, while concerning, do not carry the same level of risk but should still be addressed to strengthen internal controls and prevent escalation into material weaknesses.

Strategies to Prevent Material Weaknesses in SOX Compliance

Dealing with material weaknesses requires a proactive and comprehensive approach. Here are strategies that can help prevent material weaknesses in a company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

1. Establish effective internal controls. Implement robust internal control measures and regularly review and update them to reflect changes in the operating environment and regulatory requirements. This includes identifying key controls, establishing clear lines of authority and responsibility, and ensuring that policies and procedures are well-documented and communicated.
2. Conduct regular risk assessments. Regularly assess the risk of material misstatement in financial reporting and adjust controls accordingly. This involves identifying potential risk areas, evaluating their likelihood and impact, and implementing mitigation measures.
3. Foster a culture of compliance. Executive leaders can cultivate an organizational culture emphasizing ethical behavior, accountability, and transparency. Senior management should create an effective control environment by encouraging employees to report concerns about unethical behavior or financial reporting irregularities without fear of retaliation.
4. Enhance information and communication systems. Invest in reliable information and communication technologies that support accurate financial reporting and facilitate effective communication among employees, management, and external auditors. This includes maintaining secure and efficient systems for data collection, processing, and analysis.
5. Engage in continuous training and education. Provide ongoing training and education for employees on SOX compliance efforts, internal controls, and risk management practices. Documented policies and ongoing training help ensure all personnel are aware of their roles and responsibilities in maintaining compliance.

Best Practices for SOX Compliance

Material weaknesses are often inevitable—even in companies implementing prevention strategies.

For example, implementing a new technology platform might introduce inadequate access controls or new cybersecurity risks. Talent shortages and employee turnover might result in challenges with the segregation of duties.

That’s why, in addition to prevention strategies, companies need strategies to detect material weaknesses and work to remediate them as soon as possible.

The following best practices for compliance programs are essential for avoiding material weaknesses.

• Regular internal audits. Establish a robust internal audit function to track the company’s SOX controls and identify process improvements. This helps in early detection and remediation of potential weaknesses.
• Collaboration with audit firms and external auditors. Work closely with CPAs and external auditors to gain insights into potential vulnerabilities and benefit from their financial reporting and compliance expertise.
• Leverage technology. Use automation and data analytics to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of the company’s financial reporting processes and reduce compliance costs. Look for solutions that integrate with your ERP system. According to Protiviti’s 2023 Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance Survey, 63% of respondents leverage technology to enable their SOX compliance program.
• Identify the root cause of all material weaknesses. An effective remediation plan addresses the source of a material weakness rather than its symptoms.
• Determine whether you need additional funding or resources. Correcting a material weakness requires compliance hours, money, and other resources, which increases the cost of SOX compliance. Management should consider whether the company needs to invest in new technology, hire additional employees, or engage with outside resources or experts to address the material weakness properly and automate aspects of control testing. Often, these investments can be offset by reduced external audit fees.
• Documentation and evidence. Maintain comprehensive documentation of SOX requirements and compliance efforts, including evidence of internal control effectiveness and corrective actions to address deficiencies. This documentation is essential for material weakness disclosures.
• Handle SEC reporting. Disclose material weakness in quarterly and annual SEC filings. These disclosures shouldn’t be boilerplate—they should allow investors to understand the root cause of the issue, its impact on internal control over financial reporting, management’s plan and estimated timeline for remediation.

A SOX program that addresses prevention, timely detection, and practical remediation efforts helps ensure the integrity of financial reporting and sustain investor confidence. By understanding the nature of material weaknesses and implementing strategic compliance processes to prevent them, your organization can uphold high financial transparency and accountability standards. 

Stefan van Duyvendijk

Stefan van Duyvendijk is the Accounting Operations Evangelist at FloQast. Previously, Stefan served as the Corporate Controller for Kodiak Cakes, a private equity owned, leading consumer packaged food company, and as a Controller for Skullcandy, a multinational headphone CPG. These positions followed his five years at KPMG. His experience includes ASC 606 implementation, reduction of financial close timelines, accounting operational improvements, business combinations, financial statement audits, SOX audits and implementation, management reporting, debt, treasury, and systems integrations/implementation.